cнrιsтιne иgø.


Quick & Dirty Response

Posted in Uncategorized on January - 12 - 2010 by

Out of the three student essays, the essay in which I could relate to the most was second one. I feel as if me and that student both understand Conrad’s impressionistic style and notice his use of dark language to convey the dreary world in which they live in. I also agree with this student’s remark about Chinua Achebe making a “fiery statement in regards to [Conrad’s] manner of thinking”. I don’t think that Conrad had been maliciously thinking about Africa, but it is just a part of his “cultural eye”, if you will. This is the way he depicts Africa and the way he contrasts Africa against the European civilization is quite biased and absurd.

Three Main Devices in Lord of the Flies

Posted in Uncategorized on January - 2 - 2010 by

The three main devices I found in Lord of the Flies were contrast characters, biblical allusions, and symbolic imagery. I found that these three devices all worked to convey the theme of civilization vs. savagery.

CONTRAST CHARACTERS:
I found that Ralph and Jack were contrast characters. This device is probably the strongest out of the three because this was the direct representation of the main theme. Ralph represented the civilzation within humans while Jack represented the barbaric savagery within humans. In the end, savageness within each human will reveal itself when desperate times call for desperate measures.

BIBLICAL ALLUSIONS:
Although the novel had no direct inference to the bible at first glance, I noticed some biblical parallelism after I’ve done some research. First of all, the Lord of the Flies represents the devil. It provoked evil between the boys. Secondly, Simon’s pure heart represents Jesus. Out of all the characters, Simon was the only one who actually had natural goodness coming from his heart. And at the end when Simon discovered the truth, he was killed by the rest of the boys. One last biblical parallelism is the conversation between Simon and the Lord of the Flies. That conversation is also parallel to the confrontation between Jesus and the devil during his 40 days in the wilderness. The biblical allusions tie into the theme of civilization vs. savagery because of the fact that it was right in between the two.

SYMBOLIC IMAGERY:
The novel contained many symbolic imagery. However, the two strongest imagery I took notice of were the conch shell and the “beast”. The conch shell represented the civilization between the boys because it summoned and brought together the boys when needed. However, when it was crushed, all the democratic power and civlization between the boys was crushed too. The “beast”, on the other hand, represents the existence of savagery in all the boys. As the boys become more savage, the fear of the beast grows bigger. It grew to the point where they thought of the beast to be a godly figure rather than the devil.

My Gut Reaction to Lord of the Flies

Posted in Uncategorized on January - 2 - 2010 by

My initial reaction to the novel Lord of The Flies by William Golding was that it was an adventurous read and I felt like I escaped to another world with those boys. However, as adventurous as it was, I thought Lord of the Flies was a sad story. It raises questions in the human mind about ourselves and how we would react if we were to be put in this situation. Would we stand by the idea of civilization? Or would we let the savage in us grow and become heartless souls who fight til we die? I found it to especially sad because the author used the naive and innocent mind of young boys to illustrate the savage minds of humans. Overall though, I really enjoyed reading this work of literary merit. It was cleverly written as well as enjoyable to read.

Bookmark Response – Impressionstic Style

Posted in Uncategorized on December - 18 - 2009 by

Passage:

“The dusk was falling. I had to wait in a lofty drawing-room with three long windows from floor to ceiling that were like three luminous and bedraped columns. The bent gilt legs and backs of the furniture shone in indistinct curves. The tall marble fireplace had a cold and monumental whiteness. A grand piano stood massively in a corner; with dark gleams on the flat surfaces like a sombre and polished sarcophagus. A high door opened — closed. I rose.

“She came forward, all in black, with a pale head, floating towards me in the dusk. She was in mourning. It was more than a year since his death, more than a year since the news came; she seemed as though she would remember and mourn forever. She took both my hands in hers and murmured, ‘I had heard you were coming.’ I noticed she was not very young — I mean not girlish. She had a mature capacity for fidelity, for belief, for suffering. The room seemed to have grown darker, as if all the sad light of the cloudy evening had taken refuge on her forehead. This fair hair, this pale visage, this pure brow, seemed surrounded by an ashy halo from which the dark eyes looked out at me. Their glance was guileless, profound, confident, and trustful. She carried her sorrowful head as though she were proud of that sorrow, as though she would say, ‘I — I alone know how to mourn for him as he deserves.’ But while we were still shaking hands, such a look of awful desolation came upon her face that I perceived she was one of those creatures that are not the playthings of Time. For her he had died only yesterday. And, by Jove! the impression was so powerful that for me, too, he seemed to have died only yesterday — nay, this very minute. I saw her and him in the same instant of time — his death and her sorrow — I saw her sorrow in the very moment of his death. Do you understand? I saw them together — I heard them together. She had said, with a deep catch of the breath, ‘I have survived’ while my strained ears seemed to hear distinctly, mingled with her tone of despairing regret, the summing up whisper of his eternal condemnation. I asked myself what I was doing there, with a sensation of panic in my heart as though I had blundered into a place of cruel and absurd mysteries not fit for a human being to behold. She motioned me to a chair. We sat down. I laid the packet gently on the little table, and she put her hand over it. . . . ‘You knew him well,’ she murmured, after a moment of mourning silence.

Response:

Joseph Conrad has the ability to cleverly write in a way that leads the reader in the dark, but capable of understanding the story if the reader closely follows along. His impressionistic style is clearly demonstrated in the passage above when he’s describing the moment between him and Kurtz’s “Intended”.

The setting is in a lofty drawing room, with a cold feeling in the air. He also states that in the room, a grand piano stood in the corner “with dark gleams…like a sombre and polished sarcophagus”. This scene was written over a year after Kurtz’s death – a time when mourning should be done with. However, Conrad purposely placed those words in this part of the novel to evoke sorrow from the reader and for the reader to revisit the dark death of Mister Kurtz.

He follows this scene with the entrance of Kurtz’s Intended. Conrad states that “she came forward, all in black, with a pale head, floating towards me in the dusk.” By doing this, he’s trying to create visual imagery for the reader of a ghost coming towards him. As he continues, he states the “room seemed to have grown darker”. Later in the paragraph, he writes of how she is filled with sorrow to the point in which it felt like Kurtz had died only yesterday. By doing this, it reveals to the reader of how miserable Kurtz’s Intended is.

As you can see, Conrad is ridiculously good at casting a gloomy impressionistic style upon the reader. His impressive use of word choices allow the reader to feel the sorrow in which the characters themselves feel.  This passage here is only one out of the many passages in which reveal his cleverly crafted impressionistic style.

10 Questions from Study Guide

Posted in Uncategorized on December - 14 - 2009 by

16. Marlow learns that Mr Kurtz was a first-class agent and was a very remarkable person. He was in charge of a trading post in the true ivory-country. He also sends in as much ivory as all the others put together.

17. Marlow gets from the first station to Central Station by a caravan of sixty men for two hundred miles.

18. When Marlow arrives at the Central Station, he learns that his boat sank near the south bank and is now lost.

19. Marlow describes the general manager as a middle sized man and ordinary build and had remarkably cold blue eyes. He was an inspiration to uneasiness.

20. He likes what is in the work – the chance to find yourself. Your own reality for yourself and what no other man can ever know.

21. It’s a contrast because the Eldorado Exploring Expedition was “reckless wihtout hardihood, greedy without audacity, and cruel without courage”, opposing everything that Marlow wants and why he needs the rivets to repair his boat.

22. Conrad is suggesting that the rival company is looking for an imaginary place of great wealth and opportunity sought in South America.

23. Marlow needs the rivets and it’s frustrating him because “one’s capacity for that kind of folly is more limited than you would suppose”.

24. Juxtaposition.

25. What’s going to happen with the Eldorado Expedition people and who is this Kurtz guy.